Family, Mediation & Internet Risks: The Study of the Relation between Parental Mediation Strategies and Adolescents' Exposure to Internet risks

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mohammad Taghi Abbasi Shavazi 1
Leila Zadebagheri 2
Habib Ahmadi 3
Aliyar Ahmadi 4
1 Sociology
2 PhD candidate of Sociology, department of sociology and social planning, Shiraz University
3 Professor of Sociology, department of sociology and social planning, Shiraz University
4 Associate professor of Sociology, department of sociology and social planning, Shiraz University
10.22034/jcsc.2021.539670.2463
Abstract
Rapid innovations in communication technologies and the consequences of the Covid 19 epidemic for social interaction have pushed much of adolescent activity to the Internet. The increasing use of the Internet by adolescents, along with unprecedented opportunities, has also created emerging risks. The present study aimed to study the relationship between surveillance strategies and religion with various types of Internet risks. In this regard, 1806 students aged 18-13 in Yasuj city were selected by inverted random sampling technique and answered the questions of the online questionnaire. The results showed that there is a significant correlation between the variables of parental mediation strategy and the Internet use and the rate of adolescents' exposure to Internet risks. The results of structural equation analysis showed that parental enabling mediation and restrictive mediation strategies have a negative and significant correlation (r = -0.194) and (r = -0.106) with adolescents' exposure to Internet risks, respectively. Enabling mediation reduces the risks as children and adolescents use the Internet, while restrictive mediation is less successful even as adolescents use the Internet. This study shows that seek to restrict Internet use at the individual, family, and consequently macro levels has less of an impact on reducing Internet risks than empowering mediation that interacts with the child while supporting the Internet and they are trying to increase his internet literacy.

Keywords

  •  
  • Abbasi Shavazi, M., Moeini, M., & Pourdian, R. (2018). Cyberspace, association and risk behaviors: Study of the relationship between differential association in cyberspace with risk behaviors in real and virtual spaces: (Case of study: Students at Shiraz University). Journal of Social Order, 10(3), 77-104. .(In Persion)
  • Abdolahiyan, H., & Shikh-ansari, M. (2013). A comparative approach to efficiency of online and offline survey methods in studying facebook. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 15(3), 65-92. .(In Persion)
  • Abdolahiyan, H., & Zendedel Nowbary, B. (2013). Online survey and sampling; The problem of representativeness and its solutions. Proceedings of the first specialized seminar on electronic survey, Tehran: Iranian Students' Opinion Survey Cente. Pp.38-55. .(In Persion)
  • Aghajani ghanad, T. (2012). Investigating the effect of media literacy on the harms of cyber space, Master's thesis, Kharazmi University.(In Persion)
  • Atkin, D. J., Greenberg, B. S., & Baldwin, T. F. (2006). The home ecology of children's televison viewing: Parental mediation and the new video environment. Journal of Communication, 41, 40-52.
  • Boyd, D. M. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001a), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts,
    Applications and Programming    , New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Chen, L., & Shi, J. (2019). Reducing harm from media: a meta-analysis of parental mediation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(1), 173-193.‏
  • Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication theory, 21(4), 323-343.
  • Davis, D. & Endlar, L. D. (2001). Internet gambling. Computer Fraud & Security, (2), 9-11.
  • Dion, P. A. (2008). Interpreting structural equation modeling results: A reply to Martin and Cullen. Journal of business ethics, 83(3), 365-368.‏
  • Global Kids Online V.1. (2016). Full Survey, all questions all modules. Available online at http://globalkidsonline.net/tools/survey/v1/
  • Global Kids Online 2 (2020). Full Survey, all questions all modules. Available online at: http://globalkidsonline.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/GKO-modular-survey-data-dictionary-full-questionnaire.xlsx
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. and Tatham, R.L. (2006),
    Multivariate Data Analysis, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall
  • Jiow, H. J., Lim, S. S., & Lin, J. (2017). Level up! Refreshing parental mediation theory for our digital media landscape. Communication Theory, 27(3), 309-328.‏
  • Keith S and Martin ME (2005) Cyber-bullying: Creating a culture of respect in a cyber world. Reclaiming Children and Youth 13(4): 224–228.
  • Kirwil, L. (2009). Parental mediation of children’s internet use in different European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 3, 394-409.
  • Livingstone S (2008) Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 52(4): 581–599.
  • Livingstone, S. & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children's internet use. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 52(4), 581-599.‌
  • Livingstone, S. & Stoilova, M. (2019). Using global evidence to benefit children’s online opportunities and minimise risks. Contemporary Social Science, 1-14.‌
  • Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. Sage.‌
  • Livingstone, S. (2007). Strategies of parental regulation in the media-rich home. Computers in human behavior, 23(2), 920-941.‌
  • Livingstone, S. (2013). Online risk, harm and vulnerability: Reflections on the evidence base for child internet safety policy. ZER: Journal of Communication Studies, 18(35), 13–28. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/62278/
  • Livingstone, S. Mascheroni, G. & Staksrud, E. (2015). Developing a framework for researching children’s online risks and opportunities in Europe, EU Kids Online, London, UK.
  • ‌Livingstone, S. Mascheroni, G. & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103-1122.‌
  • Livingstone, S. Ólafsson, K. Helsper, E. J. Lupiáñez-Villanueva, F. Veltri, G. A. & Folkvord, F. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82-105.‌
  • Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU Kids Online: Final Report. LSE, London: EU Kids Online.
  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2010). Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet. New Media & Society, 12, 309-329.
  • Livingstone, S., & Stoilova, M. (2021). The 4Cs: Classifying Online Risk to Children. (CO:RE Short Report Series on Key Topics). Hamburg: Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI); CO:RE-Children Online: Research and Evidence. https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.71817
  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Gِrzig, A., & lafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the Internet: The perspective of European children. EU Kids Online, LSE: Full findings. London,
  • Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2015). Developing a framework for researching children’s online risks and opportunities in Europe.
  • Livingstone, S., Smith, P. K.(2014). Annual Research Review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: the nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 55:6, pp 635–654
  • Lwin MO, Stanaland AJS and Miyazaki AD (2008) Protecting children’s privacy online: how parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing 84(2): 205–217.
  • Malekmian, L. & Shirani, P. (1988) Application of sampling methods in social sciences. Tehran, Kalema Publications. .(In Persion)
  • Mesch GS (2009) Parental mediation, online activities, and cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 12(4): 387–393.
  • Montazer Ghaem, M. & Haji Kazem Tehrani, F. (2016). Media literacy and mechanisms for mothers to supervise over youth satellite tv usage. Rasaneh, 26(4), 19-44. .(In Persion)
  • Nasiri, B. (2020). Explaining the cognitive parenting society of cyberspace media (Case study: Tehrani parents). Sociological Cultural Studies, 11(1), 149-170. doi: 10.30465/scs.2020.5187. .(In Persion)
  • Nikkelen, S., Vossen, H., Piotrowski, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2016). Media violence and adolescents’ ADHD-related behaviors: The role of parental mediation. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 60(4), 657-675.‏
  • scale: A self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39(4), 445–469.
  • Shadieh, H. (2017). The effect of media literacy on the social impact of teens on cyberspace, master's thesis, Mashhad Ferdowsi University. .(In Persion)
  • Shojaei Jeshvaghani, R., Ahmadi, S. A., Jazayeri, R. S., & Etemadi, O. (2017). Identifying and comparing of cyberspace-cnduced damages in marital relationship (Case Study in Isfahan City). Journal of Family Research, 13(4), 551-568. .(In Persion)
  • Staksrud, E. (2013) Children in the online world: Risk, regulation, rights. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Tajik, M., & Kazemini, N. (2013). The relationship between cyberspace and cultural and religious changes on users. Journal of Cultural Management, 7(22), 17-30. .(In Persion)
  • Tavalaee, R., Sabaghi, Z., & Nezafati, N. (2017). Identify and analyze the opportunities and threats of social networks on cyberspace. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research, 10(3), 153-175. .(In Persion)
  • Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three different styles of television mediation: ‘Instructive mediation’, ‘restrictive mediation’, and ‘social coviewing’. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(1), 52–66.
  • Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & de Leeuw, R. (2013). Development and validation of the perceived parental mediation
  • Ybarra ML, Diener-West M and Leaf PJ (2007) Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health 41: S42–50.
  • Youn S (2008) Parental influence and teens’ attitude toward online privacy protection. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 42(3): 362–388.
  • Yu, J., DeVore, A., & Roque, R. (2021). Parental Mediation for Young Children’s Use of Educational Media: A Case Study with Computational Toys and Kits. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-12).‏
  • Zaman, B., Nouwen, M., Vanattenhoven, J., De Ferrerre, E., & Looy, J. V. (2016). A qualitative inquiry into the contextualized parental mediation practices of young children’s digital media use at home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 1-22.‏

 

Cultural Studies & Communication
Volume 18, Issue 68
Autumn 2022
Pages 11-41