Recognition and justice; Representation of the subaltern in the cinema of the 90s in Iran; A case study of just 6.5 film

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Dalir Bayatgol 1
Javad Kashi 2
1 Student; Allameh Tabatabaei University
2 . Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University
10.22034/jcsc.2022.539914.2467
Abstract
Ideological apparatuses and mechanisms always try to impose spurious recognition and formulate an imaginary relationship in the minds of social actors. Cinema, in the form of the official narrative and the alienating apparatus of power, and in order to maintain the dominant political and discourse unity, can represent the rejection and denial of certain bodies and voices from the public sphere. The "alienation" of the subaltern as a form of "identity policy", and in contrast to the recognition policy, reduces the issues to defective minds and damaged characters. Any attempt to restore the political community requires reversing the hierarchy that prioritizes the official documents and narratives. "Reverse reading" of the different types of texts produced by the official and dominant narrative makes it possible to see and highlight the repressed and marginalized sections of community. It also reveals the arrangements and mechanisms of the reproduction of the exclusion and repression.

Highlights

 

آگامبن، جورجو. 1389. آپاراتوس چیست؟ ترجمه یاسر همتی، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر رخداد نو.

استم، رابرت. (1389). مقدمه‌ای بر نظریه فیلم، گروه مترجمان، چاپ دوم، تهران: نشر سوره مهر.

تیلور، استفنی. 1397. تحلیل گفتمان چیست؟ ترجمه عرفان رجبی، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر نویسه پارسی.

فرتر؛ لوک. 1387. لویی آلتوسر، ترجمه امیر احمدی آریان، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر مرکز.

فرقانی، محمد مهدی. جهرمی، سید جمال‌الدین. 1390. ارائه مدلی برای تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی فیلم، فصلنامه مطالعات فرهنگ و ارتباطات، شماره شانزدهم. صص 157- 129

قهرمانی، مریم. 1393. ترجمه و تحلیل انتقادی گفتمان: رویکرد نشانه‌شناسی. چاپ اول، تهران: نشر علم.

کیت‌گرانت، بری. 1394. ژانرهای سینمایی از شمایل‌شناسی تا ایدئولوژی، ترجمه شیوا مقانلو، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر بیدگل.

هاروی، دیوید. 1398. تاریخ مختصر نئولیبرالیسم، ترجمه محمود عبدالله‌زاده، تهران: نشر دات.

هونت، اکسل. 1392. بازشناسی و عدالت؛ طرح یک نظریه چندگانه عدالت، ترجمه سمیرا توسلی، سایت ترجمان علوم انسانی.

هیل، جان؛ گیبس، چرچ. 1388. رویکردهای انتقادی در مطالعات سینمایی، ترجمه علی عامری مهابادی، چاپ اول، تهران: نشر سوره مهر.

هیوارد، سوزان. 1388. مفاهیم کلیدی در مطالعات سینمایی، ترجمه فتاح محمدی، چاپ سوم، زنجان: نشر هزاره‌ی سوم.

  Fraser, Nancy. 1996: Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics:Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. Stanford University Press.

Genel, Katia. 2016: Jacques Ranciere And Axel Honneth, two critical approaches to the political. Columbia university press.

Honneth, A. 1996: The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Idema, R. 2002: Analysing film and television: a social semiotic account of Hospital: an Unhealthy Business. In “Handbook of Visual Analysis” Edited by Leeuwen, Th and Jewiit, C. SAGE publication. P 183-207.

Jewitt, C and Oyama, R. 2002: Visual meaning: a social semiotic approach. In “Handbook of Visual Analysis” Edited by Leeuwen, Th and Jewiit, C. SAGE publication. P 134-157.

(2007):  Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory ,Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Kompridis, Nikolas. 2007:  Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition; A Matter of Identity, Justice, or Freedom? European Journal of Political Theory.

Ranciere, Jacques. 2016:  Critical questions on the theory of recognition, Columbia University Press..

Wodak , Ruth and Meyer,Michael.2001:  Methods OF Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE Publications.

 

Keywords
Recognition"
Justice"
Subaltern"
Otherness"
"
Dominant Cinema"
Subjects
 
  Fraser, Nancy. 1996: Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics:Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation. Stanford University Press.
Genel, Katia. 2016: Jacques Ranciere And Axel Honneth, two critical approaches to the political. Columbia university press.
Honneth, A. 1996: The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Idema, R. 2002: Analysing film and television: a social semiotic account of Hospital: an Unhealthy Business. In “Handbook of Visual Analysis” Edited by Leeuwen, Th and Jewiit, C. SAGE publication. P 183-207.
Jewitt, C and Oyama, R. 2002: Visual meaning: a social semiotic approach. In “Handbook of Visual Analysis” Edited by Leeuwen, Th and Jewiit, C. SAGE publication. P 134-157.
(2007):  Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory ,Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Kompridis, Nikolas. 2007:  Struggling over the Meaning of Recognition; A Matter of Identity, Justice, or Freedom? European Journal of Political Theory.
Ranciere, Jacques. 2016:  Critical questions on the theory of recognition, Columbia University Press..
Wodak , Ruth and Meyer,Michael.2001:  Methods OF Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE Publications.
 
Cultural Studies & Communication
Volume 21, Issue 81
Winter 2026
Pages 285-315