Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 . PhD candidate in communication science .allame tabatabaei university
2 professor of communication faculty of Allameh Tabatabaei university
Abstract
Generational relation has been always a theme to narrate different stories; Some war films in the seventies, eighties and nineties have symbolically addressed the relationship between the protagonist of war generation and the next generation and the challenges arising from changing circumstances. cinema choosing and representing social realities and constructing the realities in its own ways, on the other – one may ask why war filmmakers pay attention to generational relation? How is this phenomenon represented and what are its characteristics? War genre inevitably requires a protagonist to address its audiences’ needs. Many war films are based on a protagonist and his adventures and are in fact protagonist-centered stories. Thus, to review the evolution of generational relation representation in Iranian war cinema it is necessary to study the objectification of the protagonist, which reflects the characteristics of the war generation. To discuss about the subject a combined semiotics was used. In conclusion, we first present the differences within generational objects as well as different objects in each films and then, propose interpretative models based on the gathered data and applying Weber’s ideal type. Thus, the evolution of generational relation representation in Iranian war cinema proceeds from “cultural productivity; generational crisis and identity crisis” and “ambiguity in collective interpretation; Transcultural symbolism” in seventies and eighties to “generational dialectic; creation of an inter-
Highlights
- استونز، راب (1379). متفکران بزرگ جامعه شناسی. ترجمه: مهرداد میردامادی. تهران: نشر مرکز.
- آزادارمکی، تقی (1383). جامعه شناسی نسلی در ایران. تهران: پژوهشکده علوم انسانی و مطالعات اجتماعی جهاد دانشگاهی.
- آزادارمکی، تقی (1386). فرایند تغییر نسلی بررسی فراتحلیلی در ایران. دو فصلنامه تخصصی جوانان و مناسبات نسلی. شماره اول، بهار و تابستان.
- بالس، کریستوفر (1380). ذهنیت بین نسلی دیدگاهی روانکاوانه درباره اختلال نسلها. ترجمه: حسین پاینده. ارغنون، شماره 19.
- گیدنز، آنتونی (1378). راه سوم و بازسازی سوسیال دموکراسی. ترجمه: منوچهر محسنی. تهران: نشر تیراژه.
-توکل، محمد و قاضی نژاد، مریم (1385). شکاف نسلی در رویکردهای کلان جامعه شناسی: بررسی و نقد رهیافت هاای نسل تاریخی و تضاد با تاکید بر نظرات مانهایم و بوردیو. نامه علوم اجتماعی. شماره 27.
Stones, Rob (1998), Key Sociological Thinkers. (Translated from English To Persian by M. Mirdamadi). Tehran: Nashere Markaz Publication.(In Persian)
-Azadarmaki, Taghi, (2007). Generation Sociology In Iran. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Humanities and Social Studies Institute Publication. (In Persian)
-Azadarmaki, Taghi, (2007).”The Process Of Generational Change”. Two specialized quarterly magazines for youth and generational relations. First issue, spring and summer. (In Persian)
- Bollas, Christopher(2001). Generational mentality - a psychoanalytic perspective on generational differences. (Translated from English to Persian by Payandeh Hossein). Arghanon. Vol 19. (In Persian)
-Giddens, Antoni (1999). The third way and reconstruction of social democracy. . (Translated fromEnglish to Persian by Manochehr Mohseni). Tehran: Tiraje publication. (In Persian)
-Tabakol, Mohamad and Ghazinejad, Maryam (2006). “Generational gap in sociological macro approaches: review and critique of historical generation approaches and contrast with emphasis on Mannheim's and Bourdieu's views”. Social science letter. vol 27. (In Persian)
Keywords
Main Subjects
)