نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

• عباس قنبری باغستان ¹
• الهه فرهمند ²
• ماریانی محمد نور ³

¹ عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران

² دانش‌آموختۀ دکتری در رشته روان‌شناسی از دانشگاه مالایای مالزی (نویسندۀ مسئول)

³ استاد تمام گروه روان‌شناسی دانشگاه مالایا مالزی (UM) و عضو وابسته دانشگاهUniversity Segi

چکیده

هدف از این پژوهش مطالعه «رضایت زناشویی» براساس متغییرهای «صمیمیت»، «احساس تعلق» و «بخشش» است. براساس دو نظریه «سلسله مراتب نیازها» و « هدف پویا از رضایت زناشویی» این تحقیق به دنبال پاسخ به دو سئوال است: آیا تفاوت معناداری بین رضایت زناشویی و متغییرهای دموگرافیک وجود دارد؟ و چه رابطه ای بین سه متغییر احساس تعلق، صمیمیت و بخشش با رضایت زناشویی وجود دارد؟. روش این تحقیق، پیمایش و ابزار پژوهش نیز پرسشنامه بوده است. جامعه آماری این تحقیق نیز زنان متاهل شهر مشهد بوده و در مجموع 468 نفر در آن مشارکت داشته اند.
نتایج آزمون واریانس یکطرفه نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری بین رضایت زناشویی و متغییرها دموگرافیک (درآمد، استقلال محل زندگی و ...) وجود ندارد. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نیز نشان داد که سه متغییر مفهومی «صمیمیت»، «احساس تعلق» و «بخشش» علاوه براینکه دارای رابطه معناداری با «رضایت زناشویی» هستند، در مجموع 18 درصد از واریانس این مقوله را تببین می کنند.

تازه های تحقیق

 

Ahmadi, A. Z., & Fatemi, O. N. (2019). Examining the model of relationship between attachment styles and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of forgiveness and empathy.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (3) , 497.

Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., O’Connor, L. E., Parrott, L., & Wade, N. G. (2005). Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits. Journal of Personality, 73 (1) , 183–226.

Chan, R., & Joseph, S. (2000). Dimensions of personality, domains of aspiration, and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 28 (2) , 347–354.

Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress (Vol. 13). Sage Publications.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.

Droseltis, O., & Vignoles, V. L. (2010). Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30 (1) , 23–34.

Dzadey, G. A. (2015). Psychosocial Factors of Marital Satisfaction: A Study in Selected Congregations of the Ho East Presbytery of EP Church, Ghana. University of Ghana.

Fatehizadeh, M., & Ahmadi, A. (2006). The relationship between marital satisfaction and communication patterns of couples in Isfahan University. Journal of Family Research, 2, 110–120.

Fathi, A. (2013). A Comparison of Sexual Desire and Self-esteem among Monolinguals and Bilinguals. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2 (2s) , 434.

Farahmand, E., Mariani, M., Ghanbari Baghestan, A., Ale Ebrahim, N., & N., M. (9071). Five Decades of Scientific Development on “Attachment Theory”: Trends and Future Landscape. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 91 (3) , 9742-9710.

Elaheh, F., MD Nor, M., Abbas, G. B., & Danaee, M.. (2021). The Role of Intimacy, Belonging, Self-Esteem Inthe Association Between Anxious, Avoidant Attachment And Forgiveness Among Married Iranian Women. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling (IJEPC). 6 (40) , 74-92.

Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25 (1) , 1–41.

French, S., & Joseph, S. (1999). Religiosity and its association with happiness, purpose in life, and self-actualisation. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2 (2) , 117–120.

Griffin, E. M. (2006). A first look at communication theory. McGraw-Hill.

Güzel, M. O., & Barakazı, M. (2018). Maslow’un İhtiyaçlar Hiyerarşisi Kuramı Kapsamında İnsanların Turizm Hareketlerine Katılma Durumları Üzerine İlişkisel Bir Değerlendirme. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 4 (14) , 1001–1010.

121. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26 (2) , 106–121.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance.

Hoyle, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Statistical power and tests of mediation. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, 195–222.

KHOJASTEH, M. R., & Koraei, A. (2010). Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Transgression-Related Interpersonal Motivations Inventory.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn Guilford Press. New York.

Koltko-Rivera, M. E. (2006). Rediscovering the later version of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification. Review of General Psychology, 10 (4) , 302.

Kurup, P. M., Li, X., Powell, G., & Brown, M. (2019). Building future primary teachers’ capacity in STEM: based on a platform of beliefs, understandings and intentions. International Journal of STEM Education, 6 (1) , 10.

Leary, M. R., Kelly, K. M., Cottrell, C. A., & Schreindorfer, L. S. (2013). Construct validity of the need to belong scale: Mapping the nomological network. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95 (6) , 610–624.

Li, T., & Fung, H. H. (2011). The dynamic goal theory of marital satisfaction. Review of General Psychology, 15 (3) , 246.

Li, T., Tsang, V. H.-L., Fung, H. H., Qiu, X.-L., & Wang, W.-C. (2019). Measuring dynamic goals for marriage: Development and validation of the Marital Goal Scale using Rasch modeling. Psychological Assessment.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4) , 370.

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harpers.

Mickelson, K. D., Claffey, S. T., & Williams, S. L. (2006). The moderating role of gender and gender role attitudes on the link between spousal support and marital quality. Sex Roles, 55 (1–2) , 73–82.

Nikparvar, F., Stith, S., Dehghani, M., & Liang, J. G. (2018). The process of adjusting to divorce after leaving violent marriages: a case study of Iranian women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 0886260518787210.

Rizkalla, N., & Rahav, G. (2016). Differentiation of the Self, Couples’ Intimacy, and Marital Satisfaction: A Similar Model for Palestinian and Jewish Married Couples in Israel. Int’l J. Jurisprudence Fam., 7, 1.

Rusbult, C. E., Kumashiro, M., Kubacka, K. E., & Finkel, E. J. (2009). “ The part of me that you bring out”: Ideal similarity and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96 (1) , 61.

Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. CUP Archive.

 

 

 

 

کلیدواژه‌ها

• نیازجویی
• مازلو
• رضایت

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of "Intimacy", "Belonging" and "Forgiveness" on Marital Satisfaction: A Case Study of Married Women in Mashhad, Iran

نویسندگان [English]

• Abbas Ghanbari Baghestan ¹
• Elaheh Farahmand ²
• Mariani MD Nor ³

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Communication, University of Tehran

² Freelance Researcher

³ Full Professor

چکیده [English]

: The purpose of this study is to study the impact of "intimacy", "belonging" and "forgiveness" on "marital satisfaction". Based on the two theories of "Hierarchy of Needs" and "Dynamic Goal of Marital Satisfaction", this study seeks to answer two questions: Is there a significant relationship between marital satisfaction and demographic variables? And what is the relationship between the three conceptual variables of “belonging”, “intimacy” and “forgiveness” with “marital satisfaction”? The method of the study was a survey and the research tool was a questionnaire. The population of the study was married women in Mashhad and a total of 468 respondents participated in this survey.
The results of one-way ANOVA showed that there is no significant relationship between marital satisfaction and demographic variables (income, Number of children, level of study, etc.). The results of regression analysis also showed that the three conceptual variables "intimacy", "belonging", and "forgiveness" in addition to having a significant relationship with "marital satisfaction", can also predict 18% of the variance of marital satisfaction.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

• Needs
• Love
• Belonging