A dispute is the most probable incident under any contract. Had all disputes shown up in formal courts, not only business relations would have been damaged, but also the justice system might be overwhelmed. Thus, where alternative peaceful dispute resolution mechanisms are applicable, the long-term relations may survive disputes and the business can be saved. This article utilizes a socio-legal research method in order to investigate the cultural implications of constant business communication of parties on sustaining good relations among them and encourage them to employ alternative mechanisms. The research concludes then that the mechanisms will boost the culture of dialogue and the feeling of social trust between parties in the course of implementing business contracts. It also would deter disputes to be raised to the courts. Oil contracts are chosen to be the case study of this project considering the unique historic background of oil in Iran and its big share in the economy.
Akbari,A. , Ghanavaty,J. and Sheshgol,H. (2025). Implications of Culture of Dialogue on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. Cultural Studies & Communication, 21(81), 1-21. doi: 10.22034/jcsc.2021.521886.2307
MLA
Akbari,A. , , Ghanavaty,J. , and Sheshgol,H. . "Implications of Culture of Dialogue on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms", Cultural Studies & Communication, 21, 81, 2025, 1-21. doi: 10.22034/jcsc.2021.521886.2307
HARVARD
Akbari A., Ghanavaty J., Sheshgol H. (2025). 'Implications of Culture of Dialogue on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms', Cultural Studies & Communication, 21(81), pp. 1-21. doi: 10.22034/jcsc.2021.521886.2307
CHICAGO
A. Akbari, J. Ghanavaty and H. Sheshgol, "Implications of Culture of Dialogue on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms," Cultural Studies & Communication, 21 81 (2025): 1-21, doi: 10.22034/jcsc.2021.521886.2307
VANCOUVER
Akbari A., Ghanavaty J., Sheshgol H. Implications of Culture of Dialogue on Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms. Cultural Studies & Communication, 2025; 21(81): 1-21. doi: 10.22034/jcsc.2021.521886.2307