Sociological Typology of Gen z: A Critique of Generationalism

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Researcher in Phanous Research & innovation centre
2 Researcher in Phanous Reasearch & Innovation Centre
Abstract
Gen Z comprises individuals born between 1995 and 2010 (1375-1390). This paper explores their social values and attitudes, comparing them with previous generations. The aim is to describe Gen Z characteristics using empirical methods. The research employed a survey conducted through TLS sampling in urban squares across 22 regions of Tehran. The survey encompassed individuals aged 15-65 years (N=1218), with an optimal subset for each of the three generations (N=400). The Iranian Student Polling Agency (ISPA) conducted the survey. In order to design the questionnaire and analyze the findings, a number of interviews were also conducted. Content analysis of qualitative researches conducted about Generation Z has also been used.
We distinguished three distinct types among Gen Z: egoist-success oriented, family-relation oriented, and altruist – society oriented. The most prevalent type, that is the egoist-success oriented type, predominantly concerned with personal success (both in work and pleasure), views economic success as foundational to other forms of achievement such as pleasure and a good family. This type is notably more distinct from other generations compared to the family-relation and altruist-society oriented types, which exhibit fewer differences. Notably, the differences between Gen Z and Millennials are marginal, whereas disparities with older generations are more pronounced. According to our study, Gen Z demonstrates significant diversity in values and attitudes, debunking any simplistic, uniform portrayal of the generation as reductionist. While similarities exist across generational lines, substantial differences in values and attitudes underscore the complexity within Gen Z.

Keywords

Subjects


  • abdolhoseyni A, haghighatian M. (2017). Social Factors Affecting on Body Management in Youth and Young Girls and Boys in the City of Isfahan . refahj17(67), 233-271.(In Persian)
  • Bourdieu, P. (2019). Classification Struggles, Translated by Peter Collier, Polity Press.
  • Danesh, P. , Zakeri Nasrabadi, Z. and Abdellahi, A. S. (2014). Sociological Analysis of the Generation Gap in Iran. Sociological Cultural Studies5(3), 1-30.(In Persian)
  • Ensari, M. (2017). A study on the differences of entrepreneurship potential among generations. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 52–62. DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.370.
  • Ghafari and others (2018) "Social Literacy and Material Consumption among Economically Privileged Youth in Tehran," Journal of Urban Sociological Studies, Issue No. 29, pp. 27-56.(In Persian)
  • Ghazinejad, M. and Khoraman, F. (2014). Age Stratification and Value Orientations in Youth Generation Compared to Adult Generation. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports13(25), 65-96.(In Persian)
  • Hazlett JD (1998) My Generation: Collective autobiography and identity politics. Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.
  • Noori, M. and Ahmadi, A. (2018). Investigating the Attitude towards Marital Compatibility among Youth of Shiraz. Journal of Iranian Social Studies12(2), 136-154.(In Persian)
  • Nora, P. (1996). Realms of Memory: Rethinking the French Past. Columbia University Press.
  • Nouri Koochi, M. and Ahmadi, A. (2017). Social and Cultural Explanations of Marital Ideals among Youth aged 18-30 Years in Shiraz City. Iranian Population Studies3(2), 37-61.(In Persian)
  • Purhonen, S. (2016). Generations on paper: Bourdieu and the critique of ‘generationalism’. Social Science Information, 55(1), 94-114.
  • Roberts, S., & France, A. (2021). Problematizing a popular panacea: A critical examination of the (continued) use of ‘social generations’ in youth sociology. The Sociological Review, 69(4), 775-791
  • Sadafi, Z. and Babaie, S. (2014). Sociological Explanation of the Factors Affecting Youth Attitude to Consumption on Virtual Social Networks. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports13(25), 25-64.(In Persian)
  • Sadeghi, R. (2016). Analysis of the Socio-cultural Contexts of Fertility Decline in Iran. Socio-Cultural Strategy5(3), 217-246.(In Persian)
  • sajadi, G. and Maghsoodi, M. (2019). The Analysis of Change trend in Political Culture among Social Generations in Sanandaj City. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran8(4), 717-744.(In Persian)
  • Samaneh Samani & Azam Farahani. (2016). Online Identity and Instagram: Study of How Youth Present Their Identity on Instagram Rasaneh27(2), 85-104.(In Persian)
  • Samim, R. and Esporz, M. A. (2015). The Social Life of Recent Street Music in Tehran as an Urban Phenomenon A Qualitative Study of Newly Formed Types of Street Music through Life Story. Cultural Studies & Communication11(38), 63-87.(In Persian)
  • Samim, Reza (2019) "Generational Confrontation and Political Stability in Contemporary Iran," National Security Watch Journal, Issue No. 92, pp. 41-46.( In Persian)
  • Samim, Reza (2023) "Generational Confrontations and Political Stability in Contemporary Iran," Tehran: Strategic Studies Research Institute.(In Persian)
  • Sohrabzadeh, Mehran, and others (2017) "Sociological Explanation of Youth Leisure Time Patterns with Emphasis on Lifestyle," Paper presented at the National Conference on New Researches of Iran and the World in Psychology, Educational Sciences, and Social Studies.(In Persian)
  • White, J.E. (2017). Meet Generation Z. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Publishing Group
  • White, Jonathan (2013) Thinking generations. British Journal of Sociology, 64 (2). pp. 216- 247
  • Wohl, R. (1979). The Generation of 1914. Harvard University Press.
  • Zahediasl M, Fathi M, Mohammadzadeh R. (2021). Experiences and Challenges of Girls with a History of Cohabitation. refahj21(80), 275-309.)In Persian)
  • Zokaei, M. S. and Azizi Hamedani, M. (2015). The Korean Wave in Iran Motives and Consequences of The Spread of Korean Popular Culture in Iran. New Media Studies1(3), 77-124.(In Persian)