Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 َAssisstant professor- Shahid Beheshti University

2 PHD of sociology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Power is still a challenging concept in sociological theories. Classic definitions of power are not sufficient and new approaches concentrated on resistance, also the latest one used in a large scope and faced with varieties of empirical and theoretical critiques. Moreover, in both classical and lately approaches there is a dualism around power configuration. This paper, in the first place, tries to scrutiny these theoretical challenges around power configurations, afterward, clarify the relationship of different concepts of power and dimensions of power, and at the end, go through of dualism. The results show that classical configuration of power, in the best state, is limited on power-acceptance or power-powerlessness; also, new approaches outstand power-resistance and discard acceptance of power and powerlessness, whiles, in a logical point of view, in relation to power we can go beyond of dualisms and think about a multiple configuration contains power- resistance- powerlessness- acceptance of power.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abraham, Judson C (2016), Extending Gaventa: A Foucauldian Analysis of Power and Powerlessness, ASA Annual Conference, Journal of Appalachian Studies. https://mds.marshall.edu/asa_conference/2016/accepted_proposals/106/
Allen, Amy (2002) Power, Subjectivity, and Agency: Between Arendt
and Foucault, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 10:2, 131-149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550210121432 
Bayat, Asef (2000). From ‘Dangerous Classes’ to ‘Quiet Rebels’: Politics of the Urban Subaltern in the Global South, International Sociology, Sept. Vol. 15(3): 533-557.  https://doi.org/10.1177/026858000015003005 
Bayat, Asef (2012), Street Politics: Poor People's Movements in Iran, (Asadollah Nabavi Chashomi trans). Tehran: Shirazeh. (In Persian).
Bayat, Asef (2013), Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East, The second edition, Stanford University Press.
Bennett, Andy (2007), culture and everyday life, (Leila Joafshani and Hasan Chavushian trans). Tehran: Akhtaran. (In Persian).
Campbell, Colin (2009), Distinguishing the Power of Agency from Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the “Black Box” of Personal Agency, Sociological Theory, Volume: 27, issue: 4, page(s): 407-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01355.x 
Chandra, Uday (2015), rethinking Subaltern Resistance, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45:4, 563-573, DOI: 10.1080/00472336.2015.1048415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2015.1048415 
Danisch, Robert (2017), Rhetorical Agency in a Neoliberal Age: Foucault, Power, Agency, and Ethos, in K. Hong Nguyen (ed.), Rhetoric in Neoliberalism, pp. 63-85.
De Certeau, Michel (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press: Berkeley.
Digeser, Peter (1992). The Fourth Face of Power, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 4 pp. 977-1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132105 
Dominelli, L. (2002) Anti-oppressive Social Work Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Efraimsson, E., & et.al. (2003). Expressions of power and powerlessness in discharge planning. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00718.x 
Foucault, Michel (1999), Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (Nico Sarkhosh and Afshin Jahandideh trans), Tehran: Ney Publication. (In Persian).
Gaventa, John. (1980). Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Haugaard, Mark (2020). The four dimensions of power: understanding domination, empowerment and democracy, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Haugaard, Mark (2021), The four dimensions of power: conflict and democracy. Journal of Political Power, 14:1, 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379x.2021.1878411 
Hollander, Jocelyn A. & Rachel L. Einwohner (2004). Conceptualizing Resistance, Sociological Forum, Vol. 19, No. 4, Dec., pp. 533-554.
Jost, John T & et al. (2003), Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 33. Pp. 13-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.127 
Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1983). Paranoia and the Structure of Powerlessness. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 228-239.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2095107 
Pauwels Lieven J.R. & Robert Svensson (2014), Micro-Place Disorder, Subjective Powerlessness and Violent Youth Group Involvement: Testing an Integrative Control Theory, International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3, 200-221. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.18 
Proctor,G. (2002). The Dynamics of Power in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
Scott, James C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak. Yale University Press.
Scott, James C. (1989). Everyday Forms of Resistance, Copenhagen Papers, No. 4, pp. 33-62.
Scott, James. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance. Hiddens transcripts. Yale University Press.
Seeman, Melvin (1959), On the Meaning of Alienation, American Sociological Review, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 783-791
TenHouten, W. D. (2016). The emotions of powerlessness. Journal of Political Power, 9(1), 83-121.
Tew, Jerry (2006), Understanding Power and Powerlessness: Towards a Framework for Emancipatory Practice in Social Work, Journal of Social Work, 6(1): 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017306062222 
Van den torn, Jojanneke & et.al, (2014), A Sense of Powerlessness Fosters System Justification: Implications for the Legitimation of Authority, Hierarchy, and Government, Political Psychology. Volume36, Issue1, 93-110.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12183 
Vinthagen, Stellan and Anna Johansson (2013), Everyday Resistance: Exploration of a Concept and its Theories, Resistance Studies Magazine, No 1, pp: 1-46.