Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 professor of Allameh Tabatabae'i
2 University of Applied Science and Technology
Abstract
The importance of finding a safe and supportive online environment for children and adolescents, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, is an issue that requires attention in the field of communication sciences. Various countries have been working for years to understand the experiences of this age group in the online space. In Iran, theoretical resources on this subject are severely limited. Therefore, the aim of this article is to explain the dimensions and theoretical approaches that support the virtual life of children and adolescents using a descriptive-analytical approach.
This article designs a model for explaining the communication behavior of children and adolescents in social media by taking a comprehensive view and considering different approaches to their relationship with media (child-centered and media-centered), as well as different approaches to new communication technologies (such as deterministic, instrumentalist, cultural studies, and social formation). Finally, by explaining various aspects of this issue, it concludes that at a micro level, the relationship between access to social media, interaction patterns, and learning in social media can lead to the formation of a media identity for children and adolescents.
Technological changes are a process that has no direction. Understanding the place of the virtual space in the lives of adolescents requires us to avoid having a purely technological interpretation and to understand the social position of technology and its variable outputs. The virtual space can be an element that creates new cultural characteristics in the social life of young people, but these behaviors may also reproduce older conditions. In fact, a purely technological approach ignores the material and cultural conditions in which these technologies operate. Digital spaces such as websites, social networks, etc., are owned by commercial companies that target adolescents and try to shape their consumption patterns. At the same time, adolescents become empowered by using these spaces and seem to become partners in creating content. They play an important role in society and find a global and wide audience with their creative presence.
Therefore, in this article, we follow this tradition and do not seek to value, accept, or reject one of the theoretical traditions or approaches in the field of the relationship between communication technology and childhood and analyze the virtual world of children and adolescents with it. Instead, considering the research background, we aim to combine these approaches and provide a model that is suitable for the problem and research background.
Children will either become social media users or not due to digital selection or social inequality and lack of access to social media users. How children access social media is related to their interactions in this space and their view of how to use and learn from social media. Also, the type of view of social media is related to the interaction and learning patterns of child and adolescent media users, and all of these factors can affect how they identify themselves in social media and shape their own media. One of the key features of a media-centered approach is the display and management of identity in online backgrounds. "Who am I?" has become a central issue: how adolescent users present themselves as flexible subjects and gain a sense of control over their public network. Online content production is an intrinsic process of managing the identity, lifestyle, and social relationships of every child and adolescent user. Online self-representation involves a symbolic interaction that Mead and Goffman have explained, and today this symbolic process has evolved into a display that details friendly links and is used as an identity marker in user profiles. Self-managed online identities also include judgments about complex multidimensional relationships. Adolescents use their interactions with "friends" as part of this process to display their identity.
Keywords
- Carr, Nicholas. (2013). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. Translator: Mahmoud Habibi. Tehran: Goman. (in Persian)
- - Castells, Manuel. (2014). Communication Power. Translator: Hossein Basirian Jahromi. Tehran: Farhang, Honar, va Ertabat-e Institute. (in Persian)
- - Gopnik, Alison. (2018). Against Parenting: How Raising Children Has Changed over Two Generations. Translator: Mina Ghajar Gar. Tehran: Tarjoman-e Olum-e Ensani. (in Persian)
- - Jenkins, Richard. (2017). Social Identity. Translator: Nazanin Mirzabegi. Tehran: Nashr-e Agah. (in Persian)
- - Kelly, Mary Jane. (2017). An Introduction to Childhood Studies. Translator: Alireza Kermani. Tehran: Nashr-e Salis. (in Persian)
- - Mesh, Gustav A.; Telmoud, Ilan. (2014). The Social World of Adolescents in the Information Age. Translators: Esmaeil Saadi Pour Biabangard and Mina Azarnoush. Tehran: Roshd. (in Persian)
- - Newport, Cal. (2019). Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World. Translator: Samaneh Parhizkari. Tehran: Melikhan. (in Persian)
- - Zekaei, Mohammad Saeed. (2016). An Introduction to Childhood Studies in Iran. In National Conference on Childhood in Iran. Tehran: Nashr-e Agah. (in Persian)
- Ba, H., Tally, W. and Tsikalas, K. (2002) Investigating children’s emerging digital Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 1(4): 1–49.
- Bond, Emma. (2014). Childhood, Mobile Technologies and Everyday Experiences (Changing Technologies=Changing Childhoods). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bowman, S. and Willis, C. (2003). We Media: How Audiences are shaping the Future of News and Information. the Media Center at the American Press Institute
- boyd, d. (2007) ‘Why Youth (Heart) ‘Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life’, in Buckingham, D. (ed.), Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, John, D. and Catherine, T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 119–142.
- boyd, d. (2011) ‘Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications’, in Papacharissi, Z. (ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge
- Boyd, Danah. (2014). It’s complicated: the social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
- Buckingham, David & Tingstad, Vebjørg. (2010). Childhood and Consumer Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Buckingham, D. (1998) Review essay: children of the electronic age? Digital media and the new generational rhetoric. European Journal of Communication, 13(4), 557–65.
- Buckingham, D. (ed.) (2008) Youth Identity and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
- Chambers, Deborah. (2013). Social Media and Personal Relationships Online Intimacies and Networked Friendship. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Cheong, P.H. (2008) The young and the techless? Investigating Internet use and problem-solving behaviors of young adults in Singapore. New Media and Society, 10(5), 771–91
- Davies, Chris & Eynon, Rebecca. (2013). Teenagers and Technology. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
- Dutton, W.H. and Blank, G. (2011) The 2011 OxIS Survey. The Internet in Britain. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
- Dutton, W.H. and Helsper, E. (2007) The 2007 OxIS Survey. The Internet in Britain. Oxford: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
- Eastin, M. (2005) Teen Internet use: relating social perceptions and cognitive models to behavior. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 8(1), 62–75.
- Eynon, R. (2009) Harnessing technology: the learner and their context. How young people use technologies outside formal Survey report. Coventry: Becta.
- Eynon, R. (2009) Mapping the digital divide in Britain: implications for learning and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 34 (4), 277–90.
- Eynon, R. and Helsper, E.J. (2011) Adults learning online: digital choice and/or digital exclusion? New Media and Society, 13(4), 534–51.
- Eynon, R. and Malmberg L. (2011) Understanding the online information seeking behaviours of young people: the role of networks of support. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Available online at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1111/j.1365–2729.2011.00460.x (accessed 2 January 2012).
- Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R. and Sutherland, R. (2003) Screenplay: Children and Computing in the Home. London: Routledge Falmer.
- Gardner, Howard & Davis, Katie. (2013). The App Generation how today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital world. -----:Yale University Press.
- Gershon, I. (2010) Media Ideologies: An Introduction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(2), 283–93.
- Haddon, L. (2004) Information and Communication Technologies in Everyday Life: A Concise Introduction and Research Guide. Oxford: Berg.
- Helsper, E.J. (2008) Digital Inclusion: An Analysis of Social Disadvantage and the Information Society. London: Communities and Local Government.
- Helsper, E.J. and Eynon, R. (2010) Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–20.
- Hickey, Dona J & Essid, Joe. (2014). Identity and Leadership in Virtual Communities: Establishing Credibility and Influence. San Francisco: Information Science Reference.
- Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., boyd, d., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P.G., Pascoe, C.J. and Robinson, L. (with Baumer, S., Cody, R., Mahendran, D., Martínez, K., Perkel, D., Sims, C. and Tripp, L.) (2008) Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and
- Livingstone, S. (2007). From family television to bedroom culture: young people’s media at home. In E. Devereux (ed.), Media Studies: Key Issues and Debates. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 302–21.
- Livingstone, S. (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self expression. New Media and Society, 10(3), 393–411.
- Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the Internet: Great Expectations and Challenging Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E.J. (2007) Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide. New Media and Society, 9(4), 671–96.
- Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E.J. (2008) Parental mediation of children’s Internet Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 52, 581–99.
- Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E.J. (2010) Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the Internet: the role of online skills and Internet self-efficacy. New Media and Society, 12(2), 309–29.
- Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. and Ólafsson, K. (2011) Risks and Safety on the Internet: The Perspective of European Children. Full Findings. London: EU Kids Online, LSE.
- Livingstone, Sonia & Sefton- Green, Julian. (2016). The Class Living and Learning in the Digital Age. New York, NY: NYU Press
- Livingstone, Sonia and Bober, Magdalena (2004) UK Children Go Online: Surveying the Experiences of Young People and their Parents. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Livingstone, Sonia. (2002). Young people and new media. New York, NY: SAGE.
- McLanahan, S., Haskins, R., Paxson, C., Rouse, C. & Sawhill, I .(2008). Children and Electronic Media: The Future of Children. New Jersey: Princeton University & The Brookings Institution.
- McMillan, S. and Morrison, M. (2006) Coming of age with the Internet: a qualitative exploration of how the Internet has become an integral part of young people’s lives. New Media and Society, 8(1), 73–95.
- Mead, G.H. (1934/1962) Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Mesch, Gustavo S. & Talmud, Ilan. (2010). Wired Youth The Social World of Adolescence in the Information Age. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
- Palfrey, John & Gasser, Urs.(2008). Born digital : understanding the first generation of digital natives. ---: Basic Books.
- Papacharissi, Zizi, Editor. (2011). A Networked Self Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
- Peter, J. and Valkenburg, P. (2006) Adolescents’ Internet use: testing the ‘disappearing digital divide’ versus the ‘emerging digital differentiation’ approach. Poetics, 34: 293–305.
- Pew (2011) Generations 2011. Pew Internet Surveys.
- Prensky, M., 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 9(5), 1-6.
- Rasmussen, Terje. (2014). Personal Media and Everyday Life: A Networked Lifeworld. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Riva, G, Wiederhold, B. K. & Cipresso, P. (2016). The Psychology of Social Networking Identity and Relationships in online Communities. Berlin: De Gruyter
- Rose, N. (1996) ‘Identity, Genealogy, History’, in Hall, S. and Du Gay, P. (eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage, pp. 128–150.
- Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., Withey, R., Jamali, H., Dobrowolski T. and Tenopir, C. (2008) The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings, 60 (4), 290–310.
- Subrahmanyam, Kaveri & Šmahel, David. (2011). Digital Youth, The Role of Media in Development. New York, NY: Springer.
- Subrahmanyam, Kaveri & Šmahel, David. (2011). Digital Youth, The Role of Media in Development. New York, NY: Springer.
- Sundin, E. (2013). The Complex Process of Children’s Identity in New Landscapes of Media and Culture. Communication Management Quarterly, -----
- Turkle, S. (2010). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
- van Dijk, J.A. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information London: Sage.
- van Dijk, J.A. (2006) Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics, 34, 221–35.
- Willett, R., Richards, C., Marsh, J., Burn, A & Bishop, J. C. (2013). Children, Media and Playground Cultures Ethnographic Studies of School Playtimes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Zillien, N. and Hargittai, E. (2009) Digital distinction: status-specific types of Internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274–91.
)