Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Communication Sciences – Allameh Tabataba'i University

2 Phd of Allameh Tabataba'i University

Abstract

By becoming media’s role in understanding and formation of people and societies from themselves and their sphere bolder day by day, and because of video games’ role in this context as a very influencing medium, understanding theme-conveying methods of this interactive medium and knowing how these methods are employed in various political and cultural contexts gets special importance. This research tries to analyse these themes in a specific segment of video games i.e. “War on Terror” games in tactical shooter genre with the help of critical viewpoint of postcolonial studies. This research set to find what themes these war on terror games convey to user by analyzing four tactical shooter games named “Splinter Cell: Blacklist”, “Battlefiled 3”, “Medal of Honor: Warfighter”, and “Call of Duty: Modern Warfare”. This task will be done by employing thematic analysis method for video games.
Critical discovery and expression of themes in these games explains that they are used in the strategic communication of US beyond pure entertainment. These games try to intensify the binary opposition arose from neocolonialism, define the Middle Eastern Muslim human as the Other of the western civilization, consolidate superiority of West to East, and humiliate Eastern human through presentation of a strategic narrative of War on Terror in an oriental framework, and also urge to a preemptive war with Eastern human by defining him as an imminent threat for Western civilization.

Keywords

  •  

    • Bush, George. (2001, September). “President Bush’s address to a joint session of Congress and the nation”. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://b2n.ir/55023
    • Calleja, Gordon. (2011). In-Game: From Immersion to Incorporation. London: The MIT Press.
    • Calleja, Gordon. (2013). Narrative Involvement in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2013) (pp. 9-16). Chania, Crete: Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games.
    • Daldal, Asli. (2014). Power and Ideology in Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci: A Comparative Analysis. Review of History and Political Science 2, No. 2, PP: 149-167.
    • Der Derian, James. (2009). Virtuous War: Mapping the Military-Industrial-Media-Entertainment Network. New York: Routledge.
    • Egenfeldt-Nielsen, Simon; Smith, Jonas Heide; & Tosca, Susana Pajares. (2016). Understanding Video Games: An Essential Introduction (3rd Edition). New York: Routledge.
    • Erad, Dina. (2018, August). Video Games as a Propaganda Tool: Representation of the USA. MSc Thesis, METU-Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
    • Gartside, Will. (2015). But It’s Only a Game: Military-Themed First Person Shooters and Players’ Attitudes About War. MA Thesis. University of Illinois, Chicago.
    • Goddard, J. Tim. (2010). Collective Case Study. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (Vol. 1, pp. 163-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    • Herrera, Jack. (2019, March 18). “Most Terrorist Victims Are Muslim”. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from https://psmag.com/news/most-terrorist-victims-are-muslim
    • Höglund, Johan. (2008). “Electronic Empire: Orientalism Revisited in the Military Shooter”. Game Studies 8, No. 1.
    • Juul, Jesper. (2002). The Open and the Closed: Games of Emergence and Games of Progression. In Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference Proceedings (pp. 323-329). Tampere: Tampere University Press.
    • Miskimmon, Alister; O’Loughlin, Ben; & Roselle, Laura. (2013). Strategic narratives : communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge.
    • Nieborg, David. (2006). “Mods, nay! Tournaments, yay!—The appropriation of contemporary game culture by the U.S. military”. Fibreculture Journal 4, No. 8.
    • Nieborg, David. (2009). “Training recruits and conditioning youth: the soft power of military games”. In Joystick Soldiers: The Politics of Play in Military Video Games (pp. 53-66). New York: Routledge.
    • Nye, Joseph. (2015). Is the American Century Over? Cambridge: Polity.
    • Osborne, Richard. (2001). MEGAWORDS: 200 terms you really need to know. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
    • Paul, Christopher. (2011). Strategic Communication: Origins, Concepts, and Current Debates. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
    • Said, Edward. (1978). Orientalism. London: Penguin Group.
    • Said, Edward. (1983). The World, the Text, and the Critics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    • Shaban, Hamza. (2013, October 10). “Playing War: How the Military Uses Video Games”. The Atlantic. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/playing-war-how-the-military-uses-video-games/280486/
    • Sutter, John D. (2012, April 20). “Norway mass-shooting trial reopens debate on violent video games”. CNN. Retrieved March 19, 2020, from https://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/19/tech/gaming-gadgets/games-violence-norway-react/index.html
    • Thomson, Matthew Ian Malcolm. (2009). Military computer games and the new American militarism: what computer games teach us about war. PhD Thesis. University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
    • Young, Robert John. (2018). Playing politics – warfare in virtual worlds. PhD Thesis. The University of Leeds, Leeds.