Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD in Social Communication Sciences

2 Faculty member of Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch

Abstract

Abstract
The growth of fake news in cyberspace has given renewed attention to the source credibility in modern media and has brought modern humans into the "era of credibility of information" from the "information age". The present study intends to investigate what factors have influenced the source's credibility in the new media, in order to provide a platform for coping with the publication of fake news. To this end, the researcher conducted a semi-structured interview with content producers in the Persian news channels of the TELEGRAM messenger and communications science specialist, and, using the method of Thematic Analysis, 36 items were cited based on the statements presented in the interviews, Identify and categorize them in six main categories. The sample size used for the interview is 25 people. Major categories include "evolution in the concept of information credibility", "Commodification of news and advertising", "the decline of social responsibility and professionalism," "the new approach to the production of style and content of news," "change In the news values "and" Changes in the traditional concept of the gatekeeping of news ", was obtained in the direction of the research. It has been suggested that media policymakers, while upgrading the user / audience media literacy,

Keywords

 
Abidin, C. (2018). Internet celebrity: understanding fame online. Emerald: Jönköping University, Sweden.
Berlo, D. Lemert, James B., & Mertz, Robert J. (1969). “Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message source”. Public Opinion Quarterly. 33 (4): 563 ـ 576.
Brinol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009) Persuasion: Insights from the self ـ validation hypothesis. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 41 (pp. 69–118) Elsevier Academic Press.
Clarke, V. and Braun, v (2006) using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), pp. 77 ـ 101.
Fogg, B. J., Kameda, T., Boyd, J., Marshall, J., Sethi, R., Sockol, M., & Trowbrdige (2002). Stanford-makovsky web credibility study 2002: investing what makes web sites credible today. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Persuasive Technology Laboratory, Stanford University. http://www. Webcredibility.org/.
Gaziano, C., & Mcgrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly. 63(1): 451 ـ 465.
Goldsmith, R. E. , & Lafferty, B. A. (2000) The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands. 29(3): 43 ـ 54.
Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2016). What is news? News values revisted (again). London: Informa UK Limited.
Holand, C. , & Weiss, W. (1951) The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly. 15(4): 635 ـ 650.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.
Hu ,X. (2015) Assessing Source Credibility on Social Media an Electronic Word ـ Of ـ Mouth Communication Perspective, A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy.
Kavale, S. (1996) Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand oaks: CA: Sage.
Krisandra, S. F. , & Spyridakis, J. H. (2004). An Examination of Factors That Affect the Credibility of Online Health Information. Technical communication, 2(51): 239 ـ 263.
Li, R. , & Suh, A. (2015) Factors Influencing Information credibility on Social Media Platforms: Evidence from Facebook Pages. Procedia Computer Science. 72(4): 314 ـ 328.
OSGOOD. C. E., SUCI. G. J., & TANNENBAUM. P. H. (1957). The meaSllremelll of meallillg. Urbana: University of lIIinois Press
Tewksbury ,David & Jakob Jensen, Kevin Coe (2011) Video News Releases and the Public: The Impact of Source Labeling on the Perceived Credibility of Television News. Journal of Communication. 61(2): 328 ـ 348.