Authors

1 Phd Student

2 Faculty of Culture and Communication, Imam Sadiq University

3 Institute for Cultural and Social Studies

Abstract

This research attempts to answer the question that what are the strategies of cultural policy making for students to use social networks to fulfill the missions of the academic system, especially knowledge management?
Quantitative and qualitative research methods were used to answer this question. In order to study the way students use social networks, a randomly selected sampling method among students from 7 top universities in Tehran and a tool for interviewing 14 university professors in the field of cyberspace used to provide strategies for cultural policy.
According to research findings, the majority of students' approach is simply to share the content of others. 25.5 percent of students said their first priority was that they were simply sharing the content of others, and only 11.7 percent of students said they were focusing primarily on content production. 23 percent of students also tend to spend on content and 18 percent of students tend to download. This indicates that Iranian students are consuming in social networks and messengers. Therefore, it seems that social networks and messengers in the country have not been able to become knowledge management tools at universities. The reasons for this and the provision of policy strategies through in-depth interviews with professors have been taken into consideration. Also, the results of the deep interview indicate that in the field of strategic politics, we need to promote critical thinking and increase media literacy among students, professors and university officials. In addition, simultaneous policies in hardware and software are necessary.

Keywords

  1. Barhoumi, Chokri (2015). The Effectiveness of WhatsApp Mobile Learning Activities Guided by Activity Theory on Students' Knowledge Management, CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 6.
  2. Bielaczyc, K & Collins, A (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: a reconceptualization of educational practice, Instructional design theories and models, 2.
  3. Castells, Manuel (1993). European Cities, the Informational Society and the Global Economy, pp. 475-488, in R. T. LeGates and F. Stout (2003) The City Reader, London, Routledge.
  4. Cross, K. P (1998). Why learning communities? Why now. About Campus, Volume 3, Issue 3.
  5. Droge, C., Claycomb, C.AND Germain, R (2003). "Does knowledge mediate the effect of context on Performance? Some initial evidence", Decision Sciences,14(3).
  6. Giordano, C & Giordno, C (2011). Health professionals' students, use of social media, Journal of Allied Health, Volume 40, Issue 2.
  7. Grosseck, Gabriela& Bran, Ramona and Tiru, Laurentiu (2011). Dear teacher, what should I write on my wall?A case study on academic uses of Facebook, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15.
  8. Huang, J.and Newell, S (2003). Knowledge integration Processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional Projects,International Journal of Project Manage,21(3).
  9. Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C (2010). Facebook and academic performance, Computers in Human Behavior, 26.
  10. Margaryan, A, Littlejohn, A & Vojt, G (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? Students’ use of digital technologies, Computers & Education, Volume 56, Issue 2.
  11. Rovai, A.P (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community, Internet and Higher Education, 5.
  12. Saad Mohamed, Hamza (2015). The Use of Social Media Among Public Relations Students in the UAE, International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management, Volume 6, Issue 2.

Strijbos, J.W & Fischer, F (2007). Methodological challenges for collaborative learning research, Learning and Instruction, Volume 17, Issue 4.