Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 University of Tehran

2 Kish International Campus, University of Tehran

Abstract

The increasing advances in technology and the emergence of new communication technologies such as social networking websites facilitate the process of knowledge sharing by exploiting the knowledge repositories. Indeed, knowledge is a resource that its value is not only diminished by use but also is increased. The purpose of the current study is to develop a paradigmatic model for knowledge sharing in social networks by utilizing the grounded theory method and qualitative approach.
Research question was as follows: what is the appropriate model of knowledge sharing in social networks from Iranian information science specialists' point of view? Accordingly, statistical population was comprised of information science specialists across the country. Theoretical sampling led to a sample size of 15 operating in three different fields, and data gathering tool was structured interviews. We used open coding, axial coding, and selective coding in order to export concepts and categories from interviews. Based on grounded theory, research results were provided in the form of a paradigmatic model which encompasses theoretic features and is capable of predicting the executive process steps.

Keywords

  • Castells, Manuel (2007). Information Age: Economy, society and Culture (the emergence of network society) translation of A. AligoLian, A. Khakbaz, Volume I, Fifth Edition, Tehran, press new plan.
  • Chen, C. W., Chang, M. L., and Tseng, C. P. (2012). Human factors of knowledge‐sharing intention among Taiwanese enterprises: A model of hypotheses. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries.
  • Chiu, C. M. Hsu, and E.T.G. Wang. 2006. Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories. Decision Support Systems 42 1872-1888.
  • Hsu, M. T.L. Ju, C. Yen, and C. Chang. (2007). Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship Between Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Outcome Expectations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65 153-169.
  • King, W.R. and P.V. Marks. 2008. Motivating Knowledge Sharing Through a Knowledge Management Systems. Omega 36 131-146.
  • Lin, H. 2007. Effects of Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation on Employee Knowledge Sharing Intentions. Journal of Information Science 33(2) 135-149.
  •  P. L. Yong, C. C. Chong, C. W. and Yew, S. Y. (2011). Do the Big Five Personality Factors affect knowledge sharing behaviour? A study of Malaysian universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 47-62.
  • Silverman, D. (222۵, September). Instances or sequences? Improving the state of the art of qualitative research. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, ۶ (3), 2۵-39.
  • Strauss A, Corbin J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Teh,
  • Vanden Hooff, B., & deRidder, J. A. (2004). K now ledge sharing in context: Theinfluence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CM C use on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117-130.