76/5000 Sociological analysis of the role of intercultural communication in reducing the challenge of Islamophobia in the world

Fayaz, Ebrahim; Nadi, Zeinab

doi:10.22034/jcsc.2019.36670

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

ebrahim fayaz ¹
zeinab nadi ²

¹ University of Tehran, Department of Anthropology

² University of Tehran, Social Sciences of Muslims

https://doi.org/10.22034/jcsc.2019.36670

Abstract

1108/5000
In recent years, Islamophobia and clashes against Muslims have created many problems and problems not only for Muslim citizens in different parts of the world, but also a major challenge for the whole world. The history of human societies suggests that the lack of social interaction has been the cause of misunderstanding, suspicion and social conflict between human societies. The thinkers consider the context of sustainable peace to be intercultural, which plays an important role in reducing violence, promoting friendship, social tolerance and Social tolerance. In this article, the present paper addresses the role and influence of intercultural communication in reducing Islamophobia in the world. The present research method is based on the subject-matter of the documentary-analytic type. The results of the sociological analysis of the present study show that communication Interculturalism can play a major role in reducing the extent of Islamophobia in the present world, effective mechanisms in the field of intercultural communication to enhance the collective spirit, create a background for shared emotions and religious experience, retrieve and create common sacred symbols, dialogue between Muslims and the West, facilitating information from various religions This is the ultimate role in reducing fear of Islam and Islamophobia in the world will be.

Keywords

References

Abbas, Tahir. Muslim Minorities in Britain:Integration, Multiculturalism and Radicalism in the Post_ 7/7 Period, Journal of Intercultural Studies, Vol. 28, No. 3, August 2007, pp. 287 -300.

Ahmed, Young British Muslims: Social Space and Active Identity, Leicester University, 2002, inwww.lse.ac.uk/collections/EMTEL/Conference/papers/Ahm ed.doc

Baktiari, Bahman. Cybermuslim and the Internet: Searching for Spiritual Harmony in a Digital World, 2000. in Bahmanpour, m. s. and Bashir, H (eds). Muslim Identity in the 21st Century. Institute of Islamic Studies, London: BookExtra.

Brislin, Richard W. Cross- cultural Encounters, Face- to -Face Interaction, Boston, Allyn and Bacon, 1981

Bunt, Gary. Virtually Islamic, Computer- Mediated Communication and Cyber Islamic Environments, Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2000.

Casmir, Fred L. Nobleza C. Asuncion-Land,”Intercultural communication Revisited: conceptualization, paradigm Building, and Methodological Approaches “ , Communication Yearbook 12, sage,1989,pp.278-309

Encyclopedia of Race and Ethnic studies, Routledge 2003

Fauzia, Ahmad, British Muslim Perceptions and Opinions on News Coverage of September 11, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 32, No. 6, August 2006

Fischer, Nancy L. “Forword”, in Gary R.weaver,Culture, Communicat
Conflict:Readings in Intercultural Relations,1996, pp. XIII-XIV

Fourie, P.J. (Ed), Media Studies. Volume One: Institutions, Theories and Issues. Landsdowne: Juta Education, 2001.

Fredman Sandra, Discrimination and Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 1992.

Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, Runnymede Trust 1997, p. 1, Cited in Quraishi, Muzammil. Muslims and Crime: A Comparative Study, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2005

Kupchan, Ch. (2010). How Enemies Become Friends: The Sources of Stable Peace. Princeton University Press

Kuper, Adam, Jessica Kuper, The Social ScienceEncyclopedia,London,
Routledge & Kegan paul, 1985

Lewis, Philip, Islamic Britain: Religion,Politics and Identity among British Muslims_ Bradford in the 1990s, London: I.B. Tauris, 1994.

Longxi, Zh. (2009). Openness and the Dialogue of Civilizations - a Chinese Example, in Michális, S. M, and F. Petito. (eds). Civilizational Dialogue and World Order. Palgrave Macmillan.

Mitchell, J. M. (1986). International cultural relations. London: Allen and unwin Publishers.

Moon, Dreama G. “Concepts of Culture: Impilications for Intercultu
Communication Research”, Communication Quarterly,Vol. 44, No. 1, 1996, pp.
70- 84

O|Sullivan, Tim, John Hartley, Danny Saunders, MartinMontgomeryand JohnFiske, Key Concepts in Communication andCulturalStudies,London, Routledge,
1994

Prosser, Michael H. “Intercultural Communication TheoryandResearch
Overview of Major Constructs”,in B.O.Ruben,Communication Yearbook 2,
Transaction Press, 1978, pp.335-350

Rohrlich, Paul Egon, "Why Do We Study Intercultural Communication?
International Journal of InterculturalRelations,II,1987, pp. 123-128

Rohrlich, Paul Egon, “Why Do We Study Intercultural Communication?”
International Journal of InterculturalRelations,II,1987, pp. 123-128

Ryniejska Kiełdanowicz, M. (2009). Cultural Diplomacy as a Form of International Communication. University of Wrocław.

Samovar. Larry A. Richard E. Porter,Intercultural Communication:A
Belmont, Wadsworth,1994

Stankova, M. (2015). Raising cultural awareness of local traditions through festival tourism. Tourism & Management Studies, 11 (1), pp. 120-127.

Weaver, Gary R. “Preface”, in Gary R. Weaver,Culture, Communicat
and Conflict:Readings in InterculturalRelations,1996(a), pp.XV-XV1

Whitaker, B. “Islam and the British Press After September 11”.http://www.albab.com/media/ articles/ bw 02620.htm

Cultural Studies & Communication

76/5000 Sociological analysis of the role of intercultural communication in reducing the challenge of Islamophobia in the world

References

References

Volume 15, Issue 55
August 2019
Pages 33-61

76/5000 Sociological analysis of the role of intercultural communication in reducing the challenge of Islamophobia in the world

References

References

Volume 15, Issue 55August 2019Pages 33-61

Volume 15, Issue 55
August 2019
Pages 33-61