Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Member of the University Staff, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

2 Member of Research Center of Islam and Iran culture' Bahonar university of Kerman

Abstract

There are many attitudes towards popular culture. One movement, led by Mathew Arnold, rejects popular culture because it is the culture of working class and will lead to chaos if it is not controlled by the elite. Frankfurt School thinkers also reject popular culture because it is produced by culture industry and imposed on the working class by the capitalist system. The other approach which is based on consensus is inspired by Antonio Gramsci: people are not only made by culture hut also make culture. Postmodernism is another attitude which embraces popular culture. Postmodern thinkers see popular culture as a means of resistance against the status quo. The present study reviews The Window by Fahimeh Rahimi as an example of popular fiction which is deeply influenced by the Victorian literature. Focusing on the dominant sentimentalism of the novel, its stock characters and pretentious language, the dominance of chance in the plot, the unjustified use supernatural elements, repetition and the bourgeois morality of the novel, the study uses the argument of the thinkers of Frankfurt school to show that the novel does not represent a resistance against the ruling system, but invites the reader to accept the status quo by propounding bourgeois morality.

Keywords

  • Arnold, Mathew (1954) Poetry and Prose. London: Rupert Hart Davis.
  • Arnold, Mathew (1960). Culture and Anarchy. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ashby, LeRoy (2012). With Amusement for All: A History of American Popular Culture since 1830. 2nd Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky.
  • Ashley, Bob (1989). Reading Popular Narrative: A source Book. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
  • Cavelti, John G. (1977). Adventure, Mystery and Romance: Formula Stories as Art and Popular Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Certau, Michel De (2009). “The Practice of Everyday Life. Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A reader. 4th Ed. John Storey. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Dobson, Joan (1997). “Reclaiming Sentimental Literature” American Literature. Vol.69. No. 2. 263-288.
  • Donghaile, Deaglan O (2011). Blasted Literature: Victorian Political Fiction and the Shock of Modernism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Douglas, Ann (1977). The Feminization of American Culture. New York: Knopf.
  • Dyer, Richard (2001). “Entertainment and Utopia” The Cultural Studies Reader. Ed. Simon During. 2nd London: Routledge.
  • Faktorovich, Anna (2014). The Formulas of Popular Fiction: Elements of Fantasy, Science Fiction, Romance, Religious and Mystery Novels. North Carolina:
  • Ferguson, Christine (2006). Language, Science and Popular Fiction in the Victorian Fin-de- Siecle: the Brutal Tongue. Hunts: Ashgate.
  • Fiske, John (1987). Television Culture. London: Routledge.
  • Fiske, John (1994). Understanding Popular Culture. London:
  • Hoggart, Richard. (1960). the Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working Class Life with Special Reference to Publications and Entertainments. 4th London: Penguin.
  • King, Stephan. (1981). “Introduction”. The Arbor House Treasury of Horror and the Supernatural. Bill Prozini, Barry Malzberg and Martin H. Greenberg. NewYork: Arbor House.
  • King, Stephan. (1988). Bare Bones: Conversations on Terror with Stephan King. Tim Underwood and Chuck Miller.NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
  • Leavis, Frank Raymond and Denys Thompson (1933). Culture and Environment: The Training of Critical Awareness. London: Chatto and Windus.
  • Leavis, Queenie, Dorothy (1939). Fiction and the Reading Public. 2nd London: Chattu & Windus.
  • Lowenthal, Leo (1961). Literature, Popular Culture and Society. Palo Alto, CA: Pacific Books.
  • McRobbie, Angela (1994). Postmodernism and Popular Culture. London: Routledge.
  • Mussell, kay. Fantasy and Reconciliation: Contemporary Formulas of Women’s Romance Fiction. Westport CT: Greenwood.
  • Payandeh, Hossein. (2002). “The Place of Popular Culture in Cultural Studies” Arghanoon. Summer 2002, No.20. (In Persian)
  • Payandeh, Hossein. (2002). “The Place of Popular Culture in Cultural Studies” Arghanoon. Summer 2002, No.20. (In Persian)
  • Payandeh, Hossein. Interviewed by Sadegh Vafaie. 23 September 2013. https://hosseinpayandeh.ir/. Accessed 23 August 2020. (In Persian)
  • Payandeh, Hossein. Interviewed by Sadegh Vafaie. 23 September 2013. https://hosseinpayandeh.ir/. Accessed 23 August 2020. (In Persian)
  • Payandeh, Hossein. Interviewed by Mehdi Saraie. 10 September 2020. http://hosseinpayandeh.blogfa.com/tag/. Accessed 24 October 2020. (In Persian)
  • Payandeh, Hossein. Interviewed by Mehdi Saraie. 10 September 2020. http://hosseinpayandeh.blogfa.com/tag/. Accessed 24 October 2020. (In Persian)
  • Rahimi, Fahimeh. (1993). The Window. Tehran: Chakavak. (In Persian)
  • Rahimi, Fahimeh. (1993). The Window. Tehran: Chakavak. (In Persian)
  • Storey, John (2012). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. A Reader. 7th London: Routledge.
  • Storey, John (2015). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. An Introduction. 7th London: Routledge.
  • Williams, Raymond (1963). Culture and Society. Harmondsworth. Penguin.
  • Williams, Raymond (1977). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Williamson, Jennifer A (2014). “American Sentimentalism from the Nineteenth Century to the Present”. The Sentimental Mode: Essays in Literature, Film and Television. Eds. Jennifer A.Larson and Ashley Reed Williamson. North Carolina: McFarland Publishers.
  • Willis, Paul (1990). Common Culture. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Witkin, Robert W. (1999). Adorno on Music. 2nd London: Routledge.