Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 -

2 Assistant Professor · Faculty of Law and Political Science . University of Tehran

3 Assistant Professor · Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science . Islamic Azad university . Tehran Research Sciences Branch

Abstract

Immigration, in general, and "Iranian immigrants” in particular are recognized as serious issues that, despite their high importance, have not been adequately addressed in the academic literature and in the field of policy-making. In the present article, an analytical-critical approach based on exploratory data is used to offer a pathological image of post-revolutionary governments' attitude towards the phenomenon of Iranian migration. More precisely, the present study was an attempt to investigate and identify the social harms of Islamic Republic of Iran’s policies with regard to Iranian immigrants. As for methodology, in the present study the opinions of 28 policy-making and immigration experts involved in affairs of Iranians living abroad were surveyed and collected through questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Kendall's coefficient of concordance, one sample t-test and Friedman test) within the framework of SPSS software.
According to the research findings, a total of 16 harms were identified in the process of policy-making regarding Iranian immigration. Organizational disparity and lack of access to a reference institution with the power to make the final decision were recognized as major harms. Other harms extracted in this field include security attitudes towards Iranian immigrants, parallelism, lack of legal surety bond for the return of Iranian immigrants, lack of data banks, the legislative gaps in this area, and so on.
In general, it can be argued that a series of measures taken by the Islamic Republic of Iran have actually served as migration driving and encouraging factors.

Keywords

  • Azadi, Pooya and Mirramezani, Matin and Mesgaran, Mohsen, 2020, “Migration and Brain Drain from Iran”, Stanford Iran 2040 Project.
  • Chitu Okoli, Suzanne D.Pawlowski (2004), The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications, Information & Management, Volume 42, Issue 1, December 2004, Pages 15-29
  • European Asylum Support Office, Latest Asylum Trends, May 2020, https://www. easo. europa. eu/latest ـ asylum ـ trends.
  • Faghihi Rohollah, Goksedef Ece, “Off to Turkey: Iranians flee one troubled economy for another”, Middle East Eye, 14 September 2018, middleeasteye. net/news/turkey ـ iranians ـ flee ـ one ـ troubled ـ economy ـ another.
  • Financial Tribunes, November 09, 2016, Brain Drain Continues in Iran, https://financialtribune. com/articles/people/53254/brain ـ drain ـ continues.
  • Haas, H. , Czaika, M. , Flahaux, M. , Mahendra, E. , Natter, K. , Vezzoli, S. , & Villares‐Varela, M (2019). International Migration: Trends, Determinants, and Policy Effects. Population and Development Review. doi:10. 1111/padr. 12291 (https://doi. org/10. 1111/padr. 12291).
  • http://documents. worldbank. org/curated/en/881411478027078856/pdf/WPS7875. pf.
  • Jacques M. Chevalier & Daniel J. Buckles (2008), SAS²: A Guide to Collaborative Inquiry and Social Engagement. Sage.
  • Johnson, Karin A. C (2020) "International Migration, Development, and Policy: Reconsidering Migration Transition Theory—A Way Forward," Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 5. 10. 15760/hgjpa. 2020. 4. 1. 5.
  • Karimi, Neda, 2013, “Why do brains drain? Brain drain in Iran’s political discourse”, Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, Vol. 6 (2), pp: 154 ـ 173.
  • Karimi, Neda, 2013, “Why do brains drain? Brain drain in Iran’s political discourse”, Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, Vol.6 (2), 154-173
  • Koven, Steven G. · Götzke, Frank,(2010) " AmericanImmigration Policy:Confronting the Nation’s Challenges"Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London
  • Lee, Everett S, A theory of migration, Demography (1966) 3 (1): 47–57.
  • Massey, D. S. , Arango, J. , Hugo, G. , Kouaouci, A. , Pellegrino, A. , & Taylor, J. E (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and development review, 431 ـ
  • Mavris, L. , 2002, “Human Smugglers and Social Networks: Transit Migration Through the States of Former Ygoslavia”, Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, UNHCR.
  • Moghadas, A. A. & Amiri, A. M(2006), The proses of adjustment/acculturation of firstand second generation of migrant: The case of nomad Qashghaee Turks migrants inShiraz, Iran, European population conference Liverpool, UK, 21ST – 24Th . June2006.
  • Nicholas Van Hear, Oliver Bakewell & Katy Long (2017): Push ـ pull.
  • PAUL, A. M. , & YEOH, B. S. A (2020). Studying multinational migrations, speaking back to migration theory. Global Networks. doi:10. 1111/glob. 12282 (https://doi. org/10. 1111/glob. 12282).
  • Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Torbat, Akbar E. , 2002, “The Brain Drain from Iran to the US”, Middle East Journal, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 272 ـ 295.
  • Wallis, Emma, Are Iranian asylum seekers being unfairly dealt with in Germany?, Info Migrants, 2019/3/13, https://www. infomigrants. net/en/post/15676/are ـ iranian ـ asylum ـ seekers ـ being ـ unfairly ـ dealt ـ with ـ in ـ germany.