Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Sociology the Institute of Social and Cultural Studies

2 PhD in cultural policy , research institute of cultural and social studies

Abstract

From the first decade of the Islamic Revolution onwards, the humanities have been on the warring front, with the Islamization project aiming to control and rebuild the humanities. However, the admission capacity of humanities students has not only not decreased but has also grown significantly compared to other disciplines. Since the development and increase of student admission is subject to government policies, It is controlled by the government The question is, how should such different orientations be understood? How can one oppose the humanities but increase its admission capacity more than other disciplines? In this article, we review the policies and practices, the process of increasing the admission of humanities students. Findings from the research show that this extension should be understood under three discourses: The normative discourse that seeks to produce a religious subject, Self-sufficiency discourse that has been formed around the provision of financial resources. In a nutshell, we will show how, despite the expansion of the discipline (especially in terms of increasing student enrollment), the humanities has not lost its shaky and pessimistic position from a governance perspective.

Keywords

 
Fallahi, M. (1993). "Foundations of Education in Iran and Education after the Cultural Revolution of 1980". Ph.D. Thesis. Marquette University.
Mohseni, Manuchehr (1976). “Sociology in Iran”, International Social Science Journal, 22 (2): 387–90.
Razavi. R (2009). “The Cultural Revolution in Iran, with Close Regard to the Universities, and it's Impact on the Student Movement”, Middle Eastern Studies, 45:1, 1 ـ 17.
Sobhe, K (1982). “Education in Revolution: Is Iran Duplicating the Chinese Cultural Revolution?” Comparative Education", Vol. 18. No. 3: pp. 271 ـ 280.