Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Abstract
In this article through critical view try to explain approach of Ahamad Ashraf and katouzian in relation with meta narrative of modernity and Representation of local history.Accordingly, Our purpose consist of describe and critique of discourse statements of modernity and tradition, which is done through.Components of "Representation of local history" and "Western meta-narratives of modernity"It is noteworthy that, this article in order to explain similarities and differences about modernity and local history according to view of Ahamad Ashraf and katouzian. We try to answer following question:"Is it just one impression of modernity? or we can discuss about Modernities or different way of modernity in conformity with history of society?"In this two approach discussion about tradition if rely upon native history of Iranian society? Or representation from society has been formed through framework of "comparative and contrastive" in "Resemblances" or "differences" with referral of western language of history?
Keywords
)