- ذوالفقارزاده، م. و هاجری، م. (1395). شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه های مؤثر بر توسعه دیپلماسیعلم و فناوری کشور: پژوهشی مبتنی بر روش تحلیل مضمون. سیاست نامه علم و فناوری, 06(2), 105-120.
- خانیکی، ه. (۱۴۰۱). اندیشه پیشرفت و تحولات جدید جامعه ایران، بازخوانی مطالعات مجید تهرانیان در حوزههای توسعه، فرهنگ و ارتباطات. تهران: نشر نی.
- فیضی، ک. و ایراندوست، م. (1392). دلفی روشی برای تحقیق تصمیمگیری و آینده پژوهی. تهران: سازمان مدیریت صنعتی.
- میرعمادی، ط. (1396). مقدمهای بر دیپلماسیعلم و فناوری. تهران: وزارت امور خارجه، اداره نشر.
- هادیان، ن.، و احدی، ا. (1388). جایگاه مفهومی دیپلماسی عمومی. فصلنامه بینالمللی روابط خارجی. 1(3). 85-118.
ALLEA, (2019). Trust in science and changing landscapes of communication. ALLEA Discussion paper #3، January، pp. 1–20. Berlin: ALLEA–All European Academies. Available at: https://allea.org/portfo-lio-item/trust-in-science-and-changing-landscapes-of-communication/?cn-reloaded=1 (accessed 12 February 2024).
Anderson, C.W. (2019). Web 2.0. obo in Communication. doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199756841-0072
Auer, C., & Srugies, A. (2013). Public diplomacy in Germany. Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.
Bucchi, M. (2013). Style in science communication. Public Understanding of Science، 22(8)، 904-915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513498202
Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014). Science communication research: themes and challenges. In Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 1–14). London; New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203483794
Brossard, D and Lewenstine, B (2010) ‘‘A Critical Appraisal of Models of Public Understanding of Science: using practice to inform theory’’, in: Lee Ann Kaholr and Patricia A. Stout (Eds), Communicating Science: new agendas in communication, New York: Rutledge, pp. 11-39.
Bryant, C. (2003). Does Australia need a more effective policy of science communication? International Journal for Parasitology. 33(4). 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00004-3: p 306.
Colglazier, E. W. (2018). Science diplomacy and future worlds. Science & Diplomacy, 7(3), 1-20.
Černovská, E, Ana Moreno, E. (2020). ‘Levels’ in Young et al 'the Matters of Science Diplomacy: Transversal Analysis of the S4D4C Case Studies'. S4D4C (Vienna).pp.16-20.
Copeland, D. (2016). Science Diplomacy. In: The SAGE handbook of diplomacy. SAGE Publications Ltd, London. pp. 628–640. doi:10.4135/9781473957930.n52.
Feizi, K., & Irandoost, M. (2013). Delphi: A method for decision-making research and futures studies. Tehran: Industrial Management Organization. (In Persian)
Gluckman, P. D., Turekian, V. C., Grimes, R. W., & Kishi, T. (2017). Science diplomacy: a pragmatic perspective from the inside. Science & Diplomacy, 6(4), 1-13.
Guenther, L. and Joubert, M. (2017). ‘Science communication as a field of research: identifying trends, challenges and gaps by analysing research papers’. JCOM 16 (02), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16020202
Hadian, N., & Ahadi, A. (2009). The conceptual position of public diplomacy. International Journal of Foreign Relations, 1(3), 85-118. (In Persian)
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The Mediatization of Culture and Society. New York, NY and London: Routledge.
Hocking,B., Melissen, J., Riordan., s. and Sharp, P. (2012). Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century.The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.
Kaye, D. D. (2007). Rethinking Track Two Diplomacy. In Talking to the Enemy: Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia (1st ed., pp. 1–30). RAND Corporation. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg592nsrd.8
Kahan, M. (2015). ‘What is the “science of science communication”?’. JCOM 14 (03), Y04 . https://doi.org/10.22323/2.14030404
KhaniKi, H. (2022). The idea of progress and recent transformations in Iranian society: Revisiting the studies of Majid Tehranian in the fields of development, culture, and communication. Tehran: Ney Publishing. (In Persian)
Kelley, J. R. (2010). The New Diplomacy: Evolution of a Revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286–305.
Leach, J (2015). 'The Role of Science Communication in International Diplomacy', in Lloyd S Davis and Robert G Patman (ed.), Science Diplomacy: New Day or False Dawn, World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore, pp. 155-169pp.
Logan, R. (2001) ‘‘Science Mass Communication: its conceptual history’’, SciencenCommunication 23(2), pp. 135-63.
Lord, KM., Turekian, VC. (2007). Time for a new era of science diplomacy. Science 315(581):769–770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139880
Merton, RK. (1942) .The normative structure of science. In: Merton, RK (Ed) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 267–278. 1973.
Mellor, F., Webster, S. (2017). Written evidence submitted by the Science Communication Unit, Imperial College London (COM0014) to Science communication and engagement Eleventh Report of Session 2016–17. Science Communication Unit, Imperial College. Retrieved from http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/science-and-technology-committee/science-communication/written/32372.pdf
Melchor, M., Dall, E. (2020).’ Geography’ in Young et al 'the Matters of Science Diplomacy: Transversal Analysis of the S4D4C Case Studies'. S4D4C (Vienna). 1-4.
Miller, J. D. (1983). The American People and Science Policy: The Role of Public Attitudes in the Policy Process.
Miremadi, T. (2017). Introduction to science and technology diplomacy. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Publishing Office.
Mosco, V. (2005). The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murray, S. (2008). Consolidating the Gains Made in Diplomacy Studies: A Taxonomy. International Studies Perspectives, 9, 22–39.
Nye, Jr, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public affairs.
Negrine, R. (2008). The Transformation of Political Communication: Continuities and Changes in Media and Politics.
Penca, J. (2018).The rhetoric of “science diplomacy”: Innovation for the EU’s scientific cooperation? The EL-CSID Project. Institute for European Studies. Working Paper 2018/16: 1–16.
Pamment, J. (2014). The Mediatization of Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 9(3), 253–280
Pamment, J. (2015). Media Infuence, Ontological Transformation & Social Change: Conceptual Overlaps Between Development Communication and Public Diplomacy. Communication Theory, 25(2), 188–207.
Pamment, J., & Wilkins, K. G. (Eds.). (2018). Communicating National Image through Development and Diplomacy: The Politics of Foreign Aid. Springer.Roberts, I. (2009). Satow’s Diplomatic Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruffini, B. (2020).Conceptualizing science diplomacy in the practitioner-driven literature: a critical review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1). Doi: 10.1057/s41599-020-00609-5
Schafer, M. (2011) ‘‘Sources, Characteristics and Effects of Mass Media Communication on Science: a review of the literature, current trends and areas for future research’’, Sociology Compass 5(6), pp. 399-412.
Schäfer، M. (2017)، How Changing Media Structures are Affecting Science News Coverage. In: Hall Jamieson K.، Kahan D. & Scheufele D. (eds)، Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication. New York: Oxford University Press، 51-60.
Secko, D., Elyse, A. & Terrine, F. (2013) FOUR MODELS OF SCIENCE JOURNALISM, Journalism Practice, 7:1, 62-80
Stocklmayer, S. (2012). Engagement with science: Models of science communication. In Communication and engagement with science and technology (pp. 31-50). Routledge.
Trench, B. (2008). Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. Communicating science in social contexts, 119-135.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.535.5520&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2010). Science communication, an emerging discipline. Journal of Science Communication, 9(3), C03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.09030303
Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2015). Science communication research over 50 years: patterns and trends”. Science Communication Today, 15-28. http://www.science-and-you.com/sites/science-and-you.com/files/users/documents/actes_sy_2015_complet.pdf#page=28
Turekian, V. (2018). The evolution of science diplomacy. Global Policy, 9, 5-7.
Turekian, V. C., Macindoe, S., Copeland, D., Davis, L. S., Patman, R. G., & Pozza, M. (2015). The emergence of science diplomacy. In Science diplomacy: new day or false dawn? (pp. 3-24).
The Royal Society. The American Association for the Advancement of Science (2010). New frontiers in science diplomacy. The Royal Society, London.https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2010/new-frontiers-science-diplomacy.
Van Langenhove, L. (2017). Tools for an EU science diplomacy. European Commission Publications Office.
Weingart, P., & Guenther, L. (2016). Science communication and the issue of trust. Journal of Science communication, 15(5), C01.
Wagner, C. S. (2002). The elusive partnership: science and foreign policy. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 409-417.
Young, M., Rungiu, C. (2020). ‘Explicitness/Implicitness’ in Young et al 'the Matters of Science Diplomacy: Transversal Analysis of the S4D4C Case Studies'. S4D4C (Vienna). 1-4.
Zolfagharzadeh, M., & Hajari, M. (2016). Identifying the dimensions and components affecting the development of the country's science and technology diplomacy: A research based on the thematic analysis method. Science and Technology Policy Letter, 06(2), 105-120. (In Persian)
Weingart, P., & Guenther, L. (2016). Science communication and the issue of trust. Journal of Science communication, 15(5), C01.
Wagner, C. S. (2002). The elusive partnership: science and foreign policy. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 409-417.
Young, M., Rungiu, C. (2020). ‘Explicitness/Implicitness’ in Young et al 'the Matters of Science Diplomacy: Transversal Analysis of the S4D4C Case Studies'. S4D4C (Vienna). 1-4.
Zolfagharzadeh, M., & Hajari, M. (2016). Identifying the dimensions and components affecting the development of the country's science and technology diplomacy: A research based on the thematic analysis method. Science and Technology Policy Letter, 06(2), 105-120. (In Persian)
مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات